A customer delivers a very rare and expensive piece of thick figured stock to the furniture maker to be resawn and incorporated into multiple raised panels of a cabinet, all to be carefully finished and matched in location and alignment for appearance.
The furniture maker makes an error and cuts one panel too short.
To replace the materials is impossible, and if a substitute can be found the cost will consume the profit and some of the costs budgeted to build the piece.
What would be an equitable way to settle this; do all the panels get replaced, who decides of the substitute material is truly comparable, and who eats the cost ?
Purely hypothetical, no actual ox has been gored.
Try to think of it from both sides so the customer is likely to return, and the builder would want to work for him again.
Recounting actual experiences would be of interest too.
Karl
The furniture maker makes an error and cuts one panel too short.
To replace the materials is impossible, and if a substitute can be found the cost will consume the profit and some of the costs budgeted to build the piece.
What would be an equitable way to settle this; do all the panels get replaced, who decides of the substitute material is truly comparable, and who eats the cost ?
Purely hypothetical, no actual ox has been gored.
Try to think of it from both sides so the customer is likely to return, and the builder would want to work for him again.
Recounting actual experiences would be of interest too.
Karl